vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DSS, INC. (DSS) and Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Li Bang International Corp Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.7M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.1× DSS, INC.). Li Bang International Corp Inc. runs the higher net margin — -23.9% vs -420.6%, a 396.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
DSS, INC.DSSEarnings & Financial Report
DSS, Inc. is a diversified technology company offering product authentication solutions, secure identification services, blockchain-based innovation, digital asset management tools, and healthcare technology products. It primarily serves North American, Asian, and European markets across consumer goods, financial services, and healthcare core segments.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
DSS vs LBGJ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $4.7M |
| Net Profit | $-17.4M | $-1.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -98.1% | -25.1% |
| Net Margin | -420.6% | -23.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-17.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -75.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -522.7% | -25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -117.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -120.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -420.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -49.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -606.7% | -23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -94.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -111.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -105.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.64 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.58 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.7M | $10.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-832.0K | $7.8M |
| Total Assets | $67.6M | $28.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-832.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.5M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.87× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $258.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.9M | $258.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -55.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
