vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $313.0M, roughly 1.6× FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC). FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs 7.8%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs 18.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
DT vs FIBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $313.0M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $108.8M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 44.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | 108.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $250.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $248.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $261.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $251.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $244.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $242.2M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $71.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $146.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $26.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $252.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $383.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $370.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $26.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $27.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $28.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $29.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $30.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $30.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $305.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $305.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $355.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $82.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $87.6M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 6.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
FIBK
Segment breakdown not available.