vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $515.5M, roughly 1.3× Dynatrace, Inc.). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 7.8%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 2.6%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $27.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
DT vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $647.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $672.9M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $64.1M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $202.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $39.8M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |