vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $515.5M, roughly 1.6× Dynatrace, Inc.). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -5.9%, a 13.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 18.2%). Dynatrace, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.2M vs $-17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 15.5%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
DT vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |