vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Mettler Toledo (MTD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mettler Toledo is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($947.1M vs $515.5M, roughly 1.8× Dynatrace, Inc.). Mettler Toledo runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 7.8%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 7.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Mettler Toledo, stylized in all caps, is a multinational supplier of precision instruments and services. The company focuses on laboratory, industrial, product inspection, and food retailing applications. Its products are used in research, quality control, and manufacturing processes in life sciences, food, chemical, and many other industries.
DT vs MTD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $947.1M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $169.5M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 58.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | 3.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $947.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $983.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $883.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $954.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $946.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $169.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $285.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $217.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $202.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $252.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $211.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $221.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 58.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | 59.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | 61.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 59.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 25.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $13.91 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $10.57 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $9.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $7.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $11.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $9.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $10.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $60.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $-41.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $3.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $60.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $61.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $71.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $70.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-41.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $-23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $-249.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $-258.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $-182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $-126.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $-154.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $-152.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $139.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 0.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $139.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $225.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $299.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $236.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $194.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $266.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $254.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $257.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $274.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $212.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $177.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $224.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $233.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $233.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 24.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
MTD
Segment breakdown not available.
