vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and VAIL RESORTS INC (MTN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $271.0M, roughly 1.9× VAIL RESORTS INC). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -68.9%, a 76.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 4.1%). VAIL RESORTS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($244.3M vs $27.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -49.9%).

Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.

Vail Resorts, Inc. is an American mountain resort company headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado. The company is divided among divisions that own and operate 42 mountain resorts in four countries, along with hotels, lodging, condominiums, and golf courses that comprise property real estate holdings.

DT vs MTN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
DT
DT
1.9× larger
DT
$515.5M
$271.0M
MTN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
DT
DT
+14.1% gap
DT
18.2%
4.1%
MTN
Higher net margin
DT
DT
76.7% more per $
DT
7.8%
-68.9%
MTN
More free cash flow
MTN
MTN
$217.0M more FCF
MTN
$244.3M
$27.2M
DT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DT
DT
Annualised
DT
16.3%
-49.9%
MTN

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Revenue
$515.5M
$271.0M
Net Profit
$40.1M
$-186.8M
Gross Margin
81.4%
Operating Margin
14.1%
-77.4%
Net Margin
7.8%
-68.9%
Revenue YoY
18.2%
4.1%
Net Profit YoY
-88.9%
-8.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.13
$-5.20

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$515.5M
$271.0M
Q3 25
$493.8M
$271.3M
Q2 25
$477.3M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$445.2M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$436.2M
$260.3M
Q3 24
$418.1M
$265.4M
Q2 24
$399.2M
$1.3B
Q1 24
$380.8M
$1.1B
Net Profit
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$40.1M
$-186.8M
Q3 25
$57.2M
$-185.5M
Q2 25
$48.0M
$392.8M
Q1 25
$39.3M
$245.5M
Q4 24
$361.8M
$-172.8M
Q3 24
$44.0M
$-175.4M
Q2 24
$38.6M
$362.0M
Q1 24
$37.9M
$219.3M
Gross Margin
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
81.4%
Q3 25
81.8%
Q2 25
82.1%
Q1 25
80.9%
Q4 24
81.1%
Q3 24
81.4%
Q2 24
81.3%
Q1 24
81.1%
Operating Margin
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
14.1%
-77.4%
Q3 25
14.8%
-75.1%
Q2 25
13.1%
44.9%
Q1 25
9.6%
33.8%
Q4 24
10.9%
-77.6%
Q3 24
11.2%
-74.9%
Q2 24
10.5%
42.6%
Q1 24
6.1%
32.5%
Net Margin
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
7.8%
-68.9%
Q3 25
11.6%
-68.4%
Q2 25
10.0%
30.3%
Q1 25
8.8%
21.6%
Q4 24
82.9%
-66.4%
Q3 24
10.5%
-66.1%
Q2 24
9.7%
28.2%
Q1 24
10.0%
20.3%
EPS (diluted)
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$0.13
$-5.20
Q3 25
$0.19
$-4.96
Q2 25
$0.16
$10.54
Q1 25
$0.12
$6.56
Q4 24
$1.19
$-4.61
Q3 24
$0.15
$-4.63
Q2 24
$0.13
$9.54
Q1 24
$0.13
$5.76

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.2B
$581.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
$156.5M
Total Assets
$4.1B
$5.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
16.51×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$1.2B
$581.5M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$440.3M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$467.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$488.2M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$403.8M
Q3 24
$1.0B
$322.8M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$705.4M
Q1 24
$836.9M
$812.2M
Total Debt
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$2.6B
Q3 25
$2.6B
Q2 25
$2.1B
Q1 25
$2.1B
Q4 24
$2.7B
Q3 24
$2.7B
Q2 24
$2.7B
Q1 24
$2.7B
Stockholders' Equity
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$2.7B
$156.5M
Q3 25
$2.8B
$424.5M
Q2 25
$2.7B
$895.4M
Q1 25
$2.6B
$530.7M
Q4 24
$2.6B
$444.1M
Q3 24
$2.1B
$723.5M
Q2 24
$2.1B
$1.0B
Q1 24
$2.0B
$829.9M
Total Assets
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$4.1B
$5.8B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$5.8B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$5.8B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$5.5B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$5.6B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$5.7B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$5.8B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$5.8B
Debt / Equity
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
16.51×
Q3 25
6.11×
Q2 25
2.35×
Q1 25
3.99×
Q4 24
6.10×
Q3 24
3.76×
Q2 24
2.69×
Q1 24
3.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$33.8M
$315.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$27.2M
$244.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
5.3%
90.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.3%
26.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.84×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$465.5M
$352.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$33.8M
$315.9M
Q3 25
$32.0M
$-171.6M
Q2 25
$269.7M
$117.7M
Q1 25
$162.8M
$326.3M
Q4 24
$42.2M
$282.4M
Q3 24
$23.6M
$-94.2M
Q2 24
$230.7M
$109.9M
Q1 24
$131.7M
$242.7M
Free Cash Flow
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
$27.2M
$244.3M
Q3 25
$27.8M
$-227.5M
Q2 25
$262.2M
$84.5M
Q1 25
$148.2M
$251.2M
Q4 24
$37.6M
$211.4M
Q3 24
$20.1M
$-150.3M
Q2 24
$227.4M
$85.0M
Q1 24
$121.9M
$165.8M
FCF Margin
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
5.3%
90.1%
Q3 25
5.6%
-83.9%
Q2 25
54.9%
6.5%
Q1 25
33.3%
22.1%
Q4 24
8.6%
81.2%
Q3 24
4.8%
-56.6%
Q2 24
57.0%
6.6%
Q1 24
32.0%
15.4%
Capex Intensity
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
1.3%
26.4%
Q3 25
0.8%
20.6%
Q2 25
1.6%
2.6%
Q1 25
3.3%
6.6%
Q4 24
1.1%
27.3%
Q3 24
0.8%
21.1%
Q2 24
0.8%
1.9%
Q1 24
2.6%
7.1%
Cash Conversion
DT
DT
MTN
MTN
Q4 25
0.84×
Q3 25
0.56×
Q2 25
5.62×
0.30×
Q1 25
4.14×
1.33×
Q4 24
0.12×
Q3 24
0.54×
Q2 24
5.97×
0.30×
Q1 24
3.47×
1.11×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DT
DT

Subscription And Circulation$493.4M96%
Services$22.1M4%

MTN
MTN

Dining$84.6M31%
Lodgingrevenueexcludingpayrollcostreimbursements$67.2M25%
Other Mountain Revenue$55.1M20%
Managedcondominiumrooms$26.1M10%
Owned Hotel Revenue$12.7M5%
Other Lodging Revenue$10.2M4%
Other$5.9M2%
Transportation$4.8M2%
Payrollcostreimbursements$4.4M2%

Related Comparisons