vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.0× TIC Solutions, Inc.). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -9.3%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $27.2M).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
DT vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
