vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) and QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP (KWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
QUAKER CHEMICAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($468.5M vs $317.0M, roughly 1.5× DT Midstream, Inc.). DT Midstream, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.0% vs 4.4%, a 30.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DT Midstream, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs 5.5%). DT Midstream, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.0M vs $24.3M). Over the past eight quarters, DT Midstream, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.9% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Oneok, Inc. ONE-oak, stylized as ONEOK, is an American oil and gas midstream operator headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It provides the oil and gas industry with gathering, processing, fractionation, transportation, and storage services. The company is part of the Fortune 500 and S&P 500. Oneok was founded as Oklahoma Natural Gas Company in 1906, but it changed its corporate name to Oneok in 1980.
Quaker Chemical Corporation, doing business as Quaker Houghton, is an American chemical company that was founded in 1918. It is headquartered in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. With its global presence in 21 countries and 35 locations worldwide, the company has over 50% of net sales outside of the United States. Quaker Houghton manufactures process fluids for use in the steel, aluminum, metalworking, automotive, mining, aerospace, tube & pipe, can making, and other industrial processes. On August...
DTM vs KWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $317.0M | $468.5M |
| Net Profit | $111.0M | $20.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.3% |
| Operating Margin | 49.2% | 6.7% |
| Net Margin | 35.0% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.3% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.1% | 45.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $317.0M | $468.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.0M | $493.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $309.0M | $483.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $303.0M | $442.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.0M | $444.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.0M | $463.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $240.0M | $469.8M |
| Q4 25 | $111.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-66.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.0M | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.0M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.0M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.7% |
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.2% | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.7% | 11.8% |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.6% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.4% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.07 | $1.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.13 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.04 | $-3.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.06 | $0.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.73 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | $1.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $1.94 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.99 | $1.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $54.0M | $179.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $834.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.0M | $179.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.0M | $172.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.0M | $201.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $186.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $188.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | $212.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $188.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.0M | $195.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $834.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $669.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.72× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $161.0M | $46.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.0M | $24.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 5.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 41.3% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.45× | 2.25× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.0M | $80.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $161.0M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.0M | $41.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $241.0M | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | $30.0M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $176.0M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.0M | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.0M | $39.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.0M | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 41.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 2.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.29× | -0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.08× | 4.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.72× | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DTM
| Pipeline Segment | $173.0M | 55% |
| Gathering Segment | $144.0M | 45% |
KWR
| Other | $260.7M | 56% |
| Metalworking And Other | $146.4M | 31% |
| Metals | $61.4M | 13% |
