vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp (DTSQ) and GigCapital8 Corp. (GIW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company dedicated to pursuing business combinations with high-growth enterprises operating in cloud technology, enterprise software and digital services sectors, primarily targeting innovative players across the Asia-Pacific region.
GigCapital8 Corp. is a special purpose acquisition company that seeks to partner with and merge with high-potential growth firms in the technology, medical technology, and sustainable industry segments, with a core focus on North American and global cross-border market enterprises.
DTSQ vs GIW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $452.4K | $0 |
| Net Profit | $288.0K | $-87.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -36.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 63.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $452.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.5K | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $742.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $288.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $583.0K | $-87.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.5K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | -36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 85.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.4% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $461 | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-1.1M | $-62.0K |
| Total Assets | $18.0M | $3.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $461 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.1K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.5K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-736.8K | $-62.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-568.4K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-457.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.7K | $9 |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-19.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.9K | $9 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-145.5K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-139.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.22× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
