vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Duke Energy (DUK) and General Dynamics (GD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

General Dynamics is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.4B vs $7.8B, roughly 1.8× Duke Energy). Duke Energy runs the higher net margin — 15.2% vs 7.9%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, General Dynamics posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.8% vs 7.4%). General Dynamics produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $-485.0M). Over the past eight quarters, General Dynamics's revenue compounded faster (15.8% CAGR vs 1.6%).

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company serves over 7 million customers in the eastern United States. In 2024 it ranked as the 141st largest company in the United States – its highest-ever placement on the Fortune 500 list.

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S.

DUK vs GD — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GD
GD
1.8× larger
GD
$14.4B
$7.8B
DUK
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GD
GD
+0.4% gap
GD
7.8%
7.4%
DUK
Higher net margin
DUK
DUK
7.3% more per $
DUK
15.2%
7.9%
GD
More free cash flow
GD
GD
$1.4B more FCF
GD
$952.0M
$-485.0M
DUK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GD
GD
Annualised
GD
15.8%
1.6%
DUK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Revenue
$7.8B
$14.4B
Net Profit
$1.2B
$1.1B
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
27.3%
10.1%
Net Margin
15.2%
7.9%
Revenue YoY
7.4%
7.8%
Net Profit YoY
-1.7%
-0.4%
EPS (diluted)
$1.49

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$7.8B
$14.4B
Q3 25
$8.4B
$12.9B
Q2 25
$7.4B
$13.0B
Q1 25
$8.2B
$12.2B
Q4 24
$7.2B
$13.3B
Q3 24
$8.1B
$11.7B
Q2 24
$7.2B
$12.0B
Q1 24
$7.5B
$10.7B
Net Profit
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$984.0M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$994.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$930.0M
Q2 24
$900.0M
$905.0M
Q1 24
$1.1B
$799.0M
Operating Margin
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
27.3%
10.1%
Q3 25
27.9%
10.3%
Q2 25
24.8%
10.0%
Q1 25
28.5%
10.4%
Q4 24
29.2%
10.7%
Q3 24
26.4%
10.1%
Q2 24
23.9%
9.7%
Q1 24
26.1%
9.7%
Net Margin
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
15.2%
7.9%
Q3 25
17.0%
8.2%
Q2 25
13.3%
7.8%
Q1 25
16.8%
8.1%
Q4 24
16.6%
8.6%
Q3 24
15.8%
8.0%
Q2 24
12.6%
7.6%
Q1 24
15.1%
7.4%
EPS (diluted)
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$1.49
Q3 25
$1.81
Q2 25
$1.25
Q1 25
$1.76
Q4 24
$1.54
Q3 24
$1.60
Q2 24
$1.13
Q1 24
$1.44

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$245.0M
$2.3B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$80.1B
$8.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$51.8B
$25.6B
Total Assets
$195.7B
$57.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.55×
0.32×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$245.0M
$2.3B
Q3 25
$688.0M
$2.5B
Q2 25
$344.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$475.0M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$314.0M
$1.7B
Q3 24
$376.0M
$2.1B
Q2 24
$390.0M
$1.4B
Q1 24
$459.0M
$1.0B
Total Debt
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$80.1B
$8.1B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$76.3B
$8.8B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$51.8B
$25.6B
Q3 25
$51.5B
$24.4B
Q2 25
$50.9B
$23.6B
Q1 25
$50.7B
$22.2B
Q4 24
$50.1B
$22.1B
Q3 24
$49.1B
$23.0B
Q2 24
$49.7B
$22.0B
Q1 24
$49.6B
$21.4B
Total Assets
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$195.7B
$57.2B
Q3 25
$192.3B
$57.6B
Q2 25
$189.7B
$56.9B
Q1 25
$187.5B
$56.6B
Q4 24
$186.3B
$55.9B
Q3 24
$183.6B
$57.3B
Q2 24
$181.6B
$55.4B
Q1 24
$178.7B
$55.2B
Debt / Equity
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
1.55×
0.32×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.52×
0.40×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$3.7B
$1.6B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-485.0M
$952.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-6.2%
6.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
53.3%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.09×
1.37×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.7B
$4.0B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$3.7B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$2.1B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$1.6B
Q1 25
$2.2B
$-148.0M
Q4 24
$3.4B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$3.5B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$3.0B
$814.0M
Q1 24
$2.5B
$-278.0M
Free Cash Flow
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
$-485.0M
$952.0M
Q3 25
$179.0M
$1.9B
Q2 25
$-417.0M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$-971.0M
$-290.0M
Q4 24
$288.0M
$1.8B
Q3 24
$537.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$-43.0M
$613.0M
Q1 24
$-734.0M
$-437.0M
FCF Margin
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
-6.2%
6.6%
Q3 25
2.1%
14.7%
Q2 25
-5.7%
10.7%
Q1 25
-11.8%
-2.4%
Q4 24
4.0%
13.5%
Q3 24
6.6%
10.4%
Q2 24
-0.6%
5.1%
Q1 24
-9.7%
-4.1%
Capex Intensity
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
53.3%
4.2%
Q3 25
41.2%
1.6%
Q2 25
44.5%
1.5%
Q1 25
38.3%
1.2%
Q4 24
42.7%
2.7%
Q3 24
36.8%
1.7%
Q2 24
41.9%
1.7%
Q1 24
42.6%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
DUK
DUK
GD
GD
Q4 25
3.09×
1.37×
Q3 25
2.56×
1.99×
Q2 25
2.91×
1.58×
Q1 25
1.58×
-0.15×
Q4 24
2.80×
1.88×
Q3 24
2.75×
1.52×
Q2 24
3.28×
0.90×
Q1 24
2.17×
-0.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DUK
DUK

Electric Utilitiesand Infrastructure$7.0B90%
Other Revenues$741.0M10%

GD
GD

Aerospace$3.8B26%
Cost Reimbursement$2.5B17%
Information Technology Services$2.1B15%
Militaryvehicles$1.2B9%
C5ISR Solutions$1.1B8%
Aircraft Services$965.0M7%
Weapons Systemsand Munitions$935.0M7%
Surfaceships$920.0M6%
Engineeringand Other Services$360.0M3%
Repairand Other Services$344.0M2%
Contracts Accounted For Under Percentage Of Completion$88.0M1%

Related Comparisons