vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT) and FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.1M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.8× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -33.8%, a 44.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs 8.3%). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.1M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs 11.8%).
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
DUOT vs FEIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $17.1M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | -33.8% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 547.5% | 8.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -32.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $634.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.0K |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.6% | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 44.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | -36.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.4% |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $1.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.6M | $58.5M |
| Total Assets | $63.4M | $92.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6K | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $48.6M | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $55.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $51.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.7M |
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $92.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.8M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $86.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $83.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-523.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.6M | $-1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.3% | -6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 167.6% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.4M | $-5.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-523.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-155.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $385.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-786.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | -196.3% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -69.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.9% | -20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 166.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.2% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.3% | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | 167.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
