vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Spire Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.8M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.7× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -33.8% vs -176.6%, a 142.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs -26.9%). Spire Global, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-16.2M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs -32.6%).
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
DUOT vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | -33.8% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 547.5% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.6% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | -36.1% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.2% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.2% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.3% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.9% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -34.4% |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.1% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.3% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.2% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.3% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.1% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -73.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.6M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $63.4M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6K | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.1M |
| Q4 25 | $48.6M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.8M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $252.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.6M | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.3% | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 167.6% | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.4M | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.2M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | -196.3% | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.7% | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -69.6% | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.9% | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 166.2% | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.3% | -39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 167.6% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.8% | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
SPIR
Segment breakdown not available.
