vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.0× Velo3D, Inc.). DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -33.8% vs -231.9%, a 198.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs -25.2%). Velo3D, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.3M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs -1.8%).
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
DUOT vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | -33.8% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 547.5% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -36.1% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.2% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.2% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.3% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.9% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.1% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.3% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.2% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.3% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.6M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $63.4M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6K | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $48.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.8M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.6M | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.3% | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 167.6% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | -196.3% | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.7% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -69.6% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 166.2% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.2% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.3% | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 167.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
VELO
Segment breakdown not available.
