vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $205.6M, roughly 1.9× DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.8% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Double Vision is a Malaysian production studio. Established in 1985, it has production hubs in Malaysia and Indonesia. Double Vision produces over 1,400 hours of television programming per year in various languages and genres for the regional market. It also houses international entertainment TV network, Channel [V], in its studios.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
DV vs ECO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $205.6M | $393.2M |
| Net Profit | $29.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 82.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.4% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $205.6M | $393.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.6M | $308.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.0M | $-49.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.1M | $111.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.6M | $413.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $321.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.9M | $232.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.4% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 101.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | 48.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 52.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $259.0M | $116.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $573.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $259.0M | $116.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $200.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.8M | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.6M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.8M | $92.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $573.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $428.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $410.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $432.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.7M | $111.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $62.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 30.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $172.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $132.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.95× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DV
| Activation | $116.5M | 57% |
| Measurement | $69.6M | 34% |
| Supply Side | $19.5M | 9% |
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
