vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Devon Energy (DVN) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Devon Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.6× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 14.3%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -12.3%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $702.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 2.6%).
Devon Energy Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware with operational headquarters in the 50-story Devon Energy Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Its operations are in the Delaware Basin, Eagle Ford Group, and the Rocky Mountains.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
DVN vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $562.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.90 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $562.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $687.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $899.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $844.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $596.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.90 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.09 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.30 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.94 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.5B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $31.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $645.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $15.5B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $31.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.0B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.59× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.61× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.62× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $702.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.8% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.1% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.73× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.1B | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $702.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $820.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $589.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $738.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $587.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $844.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.9% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.73× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.46× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.93× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.60× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.92× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DVN
| Oil Gas And NGL Sales | $2.6B | 65% |
| Marketing And Midstream Revenues | $1.4B | 35% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
