vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 5.0%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
DXCM vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |