vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $805.0M, roughly 1.6× MODINE MANUFACTURING CO). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs -5.9%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 21.6%). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
DXCM vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $661.5M |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $47.3M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 24.6% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $72.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.7M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $788.4M |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $40.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $13.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
