vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× Dexcom). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs -16.6%, a 37.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
DXCM vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $45.0M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 34.4% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $382.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $12.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $32.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $-21.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
