vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dexcom (DXCM) and PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC (PATK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $924.2M, roughly 1.4× PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 3.1%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
Anduril Industries, Inc. is an American defense technology company specializing in the development of advanced autonomous systems.
DXCM vs PATK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $924.2M |
| Net Profit | $267.3M | $29.1M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 6.2% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.6% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.6% | 99.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $0.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $924.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $975.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $846.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.2M | $919.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.8M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.4% | 22.8% |
| Q1 26 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $0.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $2.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $917.7M | $26.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $917.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.7M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $904.9M | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.1M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.2M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.2M | $44.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $130.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $112.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $246.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.0M | $130.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.0M | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $40.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.4M | $102.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.5M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $137.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.1M | $112.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.4M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.9M | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.8M | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.8M | $77.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.3M | $120.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.9% | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | 4.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 4.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | 7.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 2.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
PATK
| Recreational Vehicle | $276.3M | 30% |
| Distribution | $222.4M | 24% |
| Marine | $141.9M | 15% |
| Industrial | $110.8M | 12% |
| Powersports | $104.8M | 11% |
| Manufactured Housing | $67.9M | 7% |
