vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Electronic Arts (EA) and Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Electronic Arts is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× Qnity Electronics, Inc.). Qnity Electronics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 4.6%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Qnity Electronics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 1.0%).
Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) is an American video game company headquartered in Redwood City, California. Founded in May 1982 by former Apple employee Trip Hawkins, the company was a pioneer of the early home computer game industry and promoted the designers and programmers responsible for its games as "software artists".
EA vs Q — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $88.0M | $211.0M |
| Gross Margin | 73.8% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 21.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -70.0% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $254.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $293.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $294.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $182.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 73.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.9% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 83.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.5% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.54 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.11 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.67 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8B | $128.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.2B | $9.1B |
| Total Assets | $13.3B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8B | $782.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $568.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 44.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 20.75× | 3.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.0M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $549.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $580.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.95× | 3.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EA
| Live Services And Other Net Revenue | $1.3B | 67% |
| PC And Other Net Revenue | $465.0M | 24% |
| Packaged Goods Net Revenue | $86.0M | 5% |
| Other | $56.0M | 3% |
| Estimated Service Offering Period | $25.0M | 1% |
Q
| Semiconductor Technologies | $693.0M | 54% |
| Interconnect Solutions | $583.0M | 46% |
