vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) and FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. (FMBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($116.5M vs $88.2M, roughly 1.3× FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC.). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -55.9%, a 82.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.4% vs -13.2%). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.0M vs $-39.3M). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -7.7%).

GrafTech International Ltd. is a manufacturer of graphite electrodes and petroleum coke, which are essential for the production of electric arc furnace steel and other metals. Headquartered in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio, it has manufacturing facilities in Calais, France;Pamplona, Spain; Monterrey, Mexico; and St. Marys, Pennsylvania.

First Mid Bancshares Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered regional financial services holding company. It provides full-range retail and commercial banking products, wealth management, insurance solutions, and agricultural financing, mainly serving individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and agricultural clients across multiple Midwestern states including Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.

EAF vs FMBH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EAF
EAF
1.3× larger
EAF
$116.5M
$88.2M
FMBH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FMBH
FMBH
+16.6% gap
FMBH
3.4%
-13.2%
EAF
Higher net margin
FMBH
FMBH
82.8% more per $
FMBH
26.8%
-55.9%
EAF
More free cash flow
FMBH
FMBH
$163.3M more FCF
FMBH
$124.0M
$-39.3M
EAF
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FMBH
FMBH
Annualised
FMBH
5.0%
-7.7%
EAF

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Revenue
$116.5M
$88.2M
Net Profit
$-65.1M
$23.7M
Gross Margin
-20.9%
Operating Margin
-33.6%
34.0%
Net Margin
-55.9%
26.8%
Revenue YoY
-13.2%
3.4%
Net Profit YoY
-31.6%
23.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-6.86
$0.98

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$116.5M
$88.2M
Q3 25
$144.0M
$89.3M
Q2 25
$131.8M
$87.5M
Q1 25
$111.8M
$84.3M
Q4 24
$134.2M
$85.3M
Q3 24
$130.7M
$80.6M
Q2 24
$137.3M
$79.2M
Q1 24
$136.6M
$79.9M
Net Profit
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$-65.1M
$23.7M
Q3 25
$-28.5M
$22.5M
Q2 25
$-86.9M
$23.4M
Q1 25
$-39.4M
$22.2M
Q4 24
$-49.5M
$19.2M
Q3 24
$-36.1M
$19.5M
Q2 24
$-14.8M
$19.7M
Q1 24
$-30.9M
$20.5M
Gross Margin
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
-20.9%
Q3 25
7.2%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
-1.5%
Q4 24
-7.8%
Q3 24
-9.2%
Q2 24
2.9%
Q1 24
-1.0%
Operating Margin
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
-33.6%
34.0%
Q3 25
-3.6%
32.2%
Q2 25
-11.0%
34.4%
Q1 25
-16.3%
33.4%
Q4 24
-18.6%
29.7%
Q3 24
-20.1%
31.5%
Q2 24
-2.0%
33.7%
Q1 24
-15.6%
33.7%
Net Margin
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
-55.9%
26.8%
Q3 25
-19.8%
25.2%
Q2 25
-65.9%
26.8%
Q1 25
-35.2%
26.3%
Q4 24
-36.9%
22.5%
Q3 24
-27.6%
24.2%
Q2 24
-10.7%
24.9%
Q1 24
-22.6%
25.6%
EPS (diluted)
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$-6.86
$0.98
Q3 25
$-1.10
$0.94
Q2 25
$-0.34
$0.98
Q1 25
$-0.15
$0.93
Q4 24
$-3.51
$0.81
Q3 24
$-1.40
$0.81
Q2 24
$-0.06
$0.82
Q1 24
$-0.12
$0.86

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
$354.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-259.6M
$958.7M
Total Assets
$1.0B
$8.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.37×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$120.7M
Q1 24
$165.2M
Total Debt
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$1.1B
$354.5M
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$929.5M
Q2 24
$928.2M
Q1 24
$926.9M
Stockholders' Equity
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$-259.6M
$958.7M
Q3 25
$-194.4M
$932.2M
Q2 25
$-168.4M
$894.1M
Q1 25
$-105.3M
$870.9M
Q4 24
$-78.9M
$846.4M
Q3 24
$-9.0M
$858.5M
Q2 24
$16.2M
$813.6M
Q1 24
$37.6M
$798.0M
Total Assets
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$1.0B
$8.0B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$7.8B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$7.7B
Q1 25
$1.2B
$7.6B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$7.5B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$7.6B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$7.6B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$7.7B
Debt / Equity
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
0.37×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
57.16×
Q1 24
24.64×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-20.9M
$130.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-39.3M
$124.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-33.7%
140.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
15.8%
7.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-120.5M
$207.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$-20.9M
$130.9M
Q3 25
$24.7M
$33.0M
Q2 25
$-53.2M
$7.7M
Q1 25
$-32.2M
$47.9M
Q4 24
$-26.4M
$124.4M
Q3 24
$23.7M
$33.1M
Q2 24
$-36.9M
$24.0M
Q1 24
$-530.0K
$29.0M
Free Cash Flow
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
$-39.3M
$124.0M
Q3 25
$18.4M
$31.9M
Q2 25
$-57.1M
$6.0M
Q1 25
$-42.5M
$46.0M
Q4 24
$-39.2M
$119.5M
Q3 24
$19.7M
$32.0M
Q2 24
$-43.8M
$22.9M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$27.6M
FCF Margin
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
-33.7%
140.6%
Q3 25
12.8%
35.8%
Q2 25
-43.3%
6.8%
Q1 25
-38.0%
54.5%
Q4 24
-29.2%
140.0%
Q3 24
15.1%
39.7%
Q2 24
-31.9%
28.9%
Q1 24
-8.1%
34.5%
Capex Intensity
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
15.8%
7.8%
Q3 25
4.4%
1.2%
Q2 25
3.0%
2.0%
Q1 25
9.2%
2.3%
Q4 24
9.5%
5.8%
Q3 24
3.1%
1.4%
Q2 24
5.1%
1.4%
Q1 24
7.7%
1.9%
Cash Conversion
EAF
EAF
FMBH
FMBH
Q4 25
5.53×
Q3 25
1.47×
Q2 25
0.33×
Q1 25
2.16×
Q4 24
6.49×
Q3 24
1.70×
Q2 24
1.21×
Q1 24
1.42×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EAF
EAF

Graphite Electrodes$107.0M92%
By Products And Other$9.4M8%

FMBH
FMBH

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons