vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) and HELIOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (HLIO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HELIOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.3M vs $125.1M, roughly 1.8× GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD). HELIOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -34.6%, a 39.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HELIOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs 11.9%). HELIOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($18.6M vs $-27.1M). Over the past eight quarters, HELIOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -4.6%).
GrafTech International Ltd. is a manufacturer of graphite electrodes and petroleum coke, which are essential for the production of electric arc furnace steel and other metals. Headquartered in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio, it has manufacturing facilities in Calais, France;Pamplona, Spain; Monterrey, Mexico; and St. Marys, Pennsylvania.
Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. was a publicly traded data analytics company based in New York City, New York. The company became widely known during its final years for acquiring and subsequently operating MoviePass, which ultimately led to the company's bankruptcy.
EAF vs HLIO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.1M | $220.3M |
| Net Profit | $-43.3M | $10.3M |
| Gross Margin | -7.8% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.6% |
| Net Margin | -34.6% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.0% | -9.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $125.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.0M | $220.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.8M | $212.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.8M | $195.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.2M | $179.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.7M | $194.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.3M | $219.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-43.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-65.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-49.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $13.6M |
| Q1 26 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.2% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | 11.8% |
| Q1 26 | -34.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -65.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.7% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.10 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.51 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.40 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.2M | $54.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $420.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $917.9M |
| Total Assets | $997.2M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $120.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.7M | $45.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $420.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $437.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $446.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $450.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.5M | $484.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $928.2M | $504.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-259.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-194.4M | $917.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-168.4M | $911.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-105.3M | $881.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-78.9M | $864.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $885.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $866.5M |
| Q1 26 | $997.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.16× | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.9M | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-27.1M | $18.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -21.6% | 8.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.7% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-105.1M | $91.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-14.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-20.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-53.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.4M | $35.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $34.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | $33.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-27.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-39.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.1M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-42.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.2M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $25.8M |
| Q1 26 | -21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -33.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.9% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EAF
Segment breakdown not available.
HLIO
| Hydraulics | $141.3M | 64% |
| Electronics | $79.0M | 36% |
