vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellington Credit Co (EARN) and GLOBUS MARITIME LTD (GLBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLOBUS MARITIME LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.6× Ellington Credit Co). GLOBUS MARITIME LTD runs the higher net margin — -19.6% vs -32.6%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ellington Credit Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1528.9% vs 0.2%).
Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.
Globus Maritime Ltd is a global shipping enterprise specializing in ownership, operation and chartering of dry bulk cargo vessels. It transports iron ore, coal, grain and other industrial raw materials across major global trade routes, serving clients in logistics, commodities trading and manufacturing sectors worldwide.
EARN vs GLBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.0M | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -35.6% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | -32.6% | -19.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1528.9% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -116.1% | -157.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 23 | $-372.0K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $5.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-815.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 23 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-13.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 114.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.9% | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -14.8% | ||
| Q1 23 | -628.2% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 476.7% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -263.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.8M | $48.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $193.7M | $173.1M |
| Total Assets | $824.1M | $309.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $70.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 23 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $25.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.1M | $178.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 23 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $103.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $309.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $824.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $752.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.5M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $217.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -1.02× | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EARN
Segment breakdown not available.
GLBS
| Other | $4.8M | 51% |
| Property Plant And Equipment Subject To Operating Leases | $4.7M | 49% |
