vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fifth Third Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.0× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). Fifth Third Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 47.7% vs 8.7%, a 39.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fifth Third Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.4% vs 3.2%).

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It is the parent company of Fifth Third Bank, which operates 1,087 branches and 2,400 automated teller machines, across 12 states: Ohio, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and West Virginia. It is on the list of largest banks in the United States and is ranked 321st on the Fortune 500. The name "Fifth Third" is derived from the names of the...

EAT vs FITB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FITB
FITB
1.0× larger
FITB
$1.5B
$1.5B
EAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FITB
FITB
+3.2% gap
FITB
6.4%
3.2%
EAT
Higher net margin
FITB
FITB
39.0% more per $
FITB
47.7%
8.7%
EAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Revenue
$1.5B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$127.9M
$730.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
11.3%
59.7%
Net Margin
8.7%
47.7%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
6.4%
Net Profit YoY
17.7%
EPS (diluted)
$2.87
$1.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Net Profit
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$128.5M
$730.0M
Q3 25
$99.5M
$649.0M
Q2 25
$107.0M
$628.0M
Q1 25
$119.1M
$515.0M
Q4 24
$118.5M
$620.0M
Q3 24
$38.5M
Q2 24
$57.3M
Operating Margin
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
11.3%
Q4 25
11.6%
59.7%
Q3 25
8.7%
55.1%
Q2 25
9.8%
54.0%
Q1 25
11.0%
45.4%
Q4 24
11.5%
53.3%
Q3 24
5.0%
Q2 24
6.1%
Net Margin
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
8.8%
47.7%
Q3 25
7.4%
42.7%
Q2 25
7.3%
42.0%
Q1 25
8.4%
35.8%
Q4 24
8.7%
43.1%
Q3 24
3.4%
Q2 24
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$2.86
$1.03
Q3 25
$2.17
$0.91
Q2 25
$2.31
$0.88
Q1 25
$2.56
$0.71
Q4 24
$2.61
$0.85
Q3 24
$0.84
Q2 24
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
$13.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$406.0M
$21.7B
Total Assets
$2.8B
$214.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$15.0M
Q3 25
$33.6M
Q2 25
$18.9M
Q1 25
$17.5M
Q4 24
$14.8M
Q3 24
$16.2M
Q2 24
$64.6M
Total Debt
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
$13.6B
Q3 25
$525.8M
$13.7B
Q2 25
$426.0M
$14.5B
Q1 25
$518.3M
$14.5B
Q4 24
$652.0M
$14.3B
Q3 24
$806.9M
Q2 24
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$379.3M
$21.7B
Q3 25
$343.9M
$21.1B
Q2 25
$370.9M
$21.1B
Q1 25
$259.0M
$20.4B
Q4 24
$131.5M
$19.6B
Q3 24
$12.7M
Q2 24
$39.4M
Total Assets
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$214.4B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$212.9B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$210.0B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$212.7B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$212.9B
Q3 24
$2.5B
Q2 24
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
0.63×
Q3 25
1.53×
0.65×
Q2 25
1.15×
0.69×
Q1 25
2.00×
0.71×
Q4 24
4.96×
0.73×
Q3 24
63.54×
Q2 24
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$571.8M
$929.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$765.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
50.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
10.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.47×
1.27×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.9B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$218.9M
$929.0M
Q3 25
$120.8M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$186.0M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$212.0M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$218.2M
$-101.0M
Q3 24
$62.8M
Q2 24
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
$765.0M
Q3 25
$62.2M
$886.0M
Q2 25
$106.1M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$132.4M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$168.9M
$-246.0M
Q3 24
$6.3M
Q2 24
$83.5M
FCF Margin
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.7%
50.0%
Q3 25
4.6%
58.3%
Q2 25
7.3%
77.8%
Q1 25
9.3%
77.7%
Q4 24
12.4%
-17.1%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
6.9%
Capex Intensity
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.4%
10.7%
Q3 25
4.3%
10.5%
Q2 25
5.5%
9.6%
Q1 25
5.6%
8.1%
Q4 24
3.6%
10.1%
Q3 24
5.0%
Q2 24
4.8%
Cash Conversion
EAT
EAT
FITB
FITB
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
1.70×
1.27×
Q3 25
1.21×
1.61×
Q2 25
1.74×
2.08×
Q1 25
1.78×
2.39×
Q4 24
1.84×
-0.16×
Q3 24
1.63×
Q2 24
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

FITB
FITB

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons