vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and Genpact LTD (G). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.1× Genpact LTD). Genpact LTD runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs 8.7%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Genpact LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.6% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 8.0%).

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

Genpact Ltd. is an American information technology services, consulting, and outsourcing company headquartered in New York City, New York. Founded in Gurgaon, India, and legally domiciled in Bermuda, Genpact employs more than 125,000 people and provides services to clients in over 30 countries worldwide. Genpact is listed on the NYSE and generated revenues of US$4.48 billion in 2023.

EAT vs G — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EAT
EAT
1.1× larger
EAT
$1.5B
$1.3B
G
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
G
G
+2.5% gap
G
5.6%
3.2%
EAT
Higher net margin
G
G
2.1% more per $
G
10.8%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EAT
EAT
Annualised
EAT
10.3%
8.0%
G

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EAT
EAT
G
G
Revenue
$1.5B
$1.3B
Net Profit
$127.9M
$143.1M
Gross Margin
36.6%
Operating Margin
11.3%
14.8%
Net Margin
8.7%
10.8%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
5.6%
Net Profit YoY
0.8%
EPS (diluted)
$2.87
$0.82

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.2B
Net Profit
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$128.5M
$143.1M
Q3 25
$99.5M
$145.8M
Q2 25
$107.0M
$132.7M
Q1 25
$119.1M
$130.9M
Q4 24
$118.5M
$141.9M
Q3 24
$38.5M
$132.8M
Q2 24
$57.3M
$122.0M
Gross Margin
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
Q4 25
36.6%
Q3 25
36.4%
Q2 25
35.9%
Q1 25
35.3%
Q4 24
35.7%
Q3 24
35.6%
Q2 24
35.4%
Operating Margin
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
11.3%
Q4 25
11.6%
14.8%
Q3 25
8.7%
14.8%
Q2 25
9.8%
14.3%
Q1 25
11.0%
15.1%
Q4 24
11.5%
15.2%
Q3 24
5.0%
15.0%
Q2 24
6.1%
14.5%
Net Margin
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
8.8%
10.8%
Q3 25
7.4%
11.3%
Q2 25
7.3%
10.6%
Q1 25
8.4%
10.8%
Q4 24
8.7%
11.4%
Q3 24
3.4%
11.0%
Q2 24
4.7%
10.4%
EPS (diluted)
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$2.86
$0.82
Q3 25
$2.17
$0.83
Q2 25
$2.31
$0.75
Q1 25
$2.56
$0.73
Q4 24
$2.61
$0.80
Q3 24
$0.84
$0.74
Q2 24
$1.22
$0.67

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EAT
EAT
G
G
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.2B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
$1.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$406.0M
$2.5B
Total Assets
$2.8B
$5.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×
0.60×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
Q4 25
$15.0M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$33.6M
$740.8M
Q2 25
$18.9M
$663.3M
Q1 25
$17.5M
$561.6M
Q4 24
$14.8M
$671.6M
Q3 24
$16.2M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$64.6M
$914.2M
Total Debt
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$525.8M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$426.0M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$518.3M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$652.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$806.9M
$1.6B
Q2 24
$786.3M
$1.6B
Stockholders' Equity
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$379.3M
$2.5B
Q3 25
$343.9M
$2.5B
Q2 25
$370.9M
$2.6B
Q1 25
$259.0M
$2.5B
Q4 24
$131.5M
$2.4B
Q3 24
$12.7M
$2.4B
Q2 24
$39.4M
$2.3B
Total Assets
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$5.8B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$5.4B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$5.3B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$4.9B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$5.0B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$5.3B
Q2 24
$2.6B
$5.2B
Debt / Equity
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
0.60×
Q3 25
1.53×
0.47×
Q2 25
1.15×
0.47×
Q1 25
2.00×
0.50×
Q4 24
4.96×
0.51×
Q3 24
63.54×
0.68×
Q2 24
19.96×
0.70×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EAT
EAT
G
G
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$571.8M
$286.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$269.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
20.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.47×
2.00×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$734.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$218.9M
$286.7M
Q3 25
$120.8M
$308.4M
Q2 25
$186.0M
$177.4M
Q1 25
$212.0M
$40.4M
Q4 24
$218.2M
$203.2M
Q3 24
$62.8M
$228.5M
Q2 24
$141.5M
$209.3M
Free Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
$269.0M
Q3 25
$62.2M
$292.0M
Q2 25
$106.1M
$155.1M
Q1 25
$132.4M
$18.5M
Q4 24
$168.9M
$183.5M
Q3 24
$6.3M
$208.7M
Q2 24
$83.5M
$190.0M
FCF Margin
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.7%
20.4%
Q3 25
4.6%
22.6%
Q2 25
7.3%
12.4%
Q1 25
9.3%
1.5%
Q4 24
12.4%
14.7%
Q3 24
0.6%
17.2%
Q2 24
6.9%
16.2%
Capex Intensity
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.4%
1.3%
Q3 25
4.3%
1.3%
Q2 25
5.5%
1.8%
Q1 25
5.6%
1.8%
Q4 24
3.6%
1.6%
Q3 24
5.0%
1.6%
Q2 24
4.8%
1.6%
Cash Conversion
EAT
EAT
G
G
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
1.70×
2.00×
Q3 25
1.21×
2.11×
Q2 25
1.74×
1.34×
Q1 25
1.78×
0.31×
Q4 24
1.84×
1.43×
Q3 24
1.63×
1.72×
Q2 24
2.47×
1.72×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

G
G

High Tech And Manufacturing$525.3M40%
Consumer And Healthcare$445.8M34%
Financial Services$348.2M26%

Related Comparisons