vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $802.0M, roughly 1.8× JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.). BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -5.2%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.
JELD-WEN is an American company with its headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company operates more than 120 manufacturing facilities in 19 countries. JELD-WEN designs, produces and distributes interior and exterior doors, wood, vinyl and aluminum windows, wall systems, shower enclosures, closet systems and other components used in the new construction, as well as repair and remodel of residential homes and non-residential buildings.
EAT vs JELD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $802.0M |
| Net Profit | $127.9M | $-41.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | -1.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | -5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 38.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.87 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $802.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $809.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $823.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $776.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $895.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $934.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $986.0M |
| Q1 26 | $127.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $-367.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.1M | $-190.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.5M | $-68.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.5M | $-74.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $-18.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | -25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | -23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -1.9% |
| Q1 26 | $2.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.86 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.17 | $-4.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.31 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.56 | $-2.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.61 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | $-0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $136.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $424.4M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $406.0M | $92.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.05× | 12.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $136.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.6M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $134.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $132.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | $150.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $208.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $212.8M |
| Q1 26 | $424.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $451.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $525.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $518.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $806.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.3M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $406.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $379.3M | $92.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.9M | $113.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.9M | $477.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.0M | $452.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.5M | $620.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $720.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $770.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | 12.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | 10.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.15× | 2.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.00× | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.54× | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.96× | 1.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $571.8M | $32.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-124.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $571.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.8M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.0M | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.0M | $-83.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.2M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.8M | $37.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.5M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $155.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.2M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.4M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.9M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.5M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EAT
| Company sales | $1.5B | 99% |
| Franchise revenues | $14.7M | 1% |
JELD
| North America Segment | $522.0M | 65% |
| Europe Segment | $280.0M | 35% |
