vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and Prologis (PLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Prologis is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). Prologis runs the higher net margin — 62.1% vs 8.7%, a 53.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 7.3%).

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

Prologis, Inc. is a real estate investment trust headquartered in San Francisco, California that invests in logistics facilities. The company was formed through the merger of AMB Property Corporation and Prologis in June 2011, which made Prologis the largest industrial real estate company in the world. As of 2025, the company operates more than 15,000 land acres and over 6,000 buildings comprising about 1.

EAT vs PLD — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PLD
PLD
1.5× larger
PLD
$2.3B
$1.5B
EAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EAT
EAT
+0.8% gap
EAT
3.2%
2.4%
PLD
Higher net margin
PLD
PLD
53.4% more per $
PLD
62.1%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EAT
EAT
Annualised
EAT
10.3%
7.3%
PLD

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Revenue
$1.5B
$2.3B
Net Profit
$127.9M
$1.4B
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
11.3%
72.2%
Net Margin
8.7%
62.1%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
2.4%
Net Profit YoY
7.4%
9.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.87
$1.50

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$2.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$2.0B
Net Profit
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$128.5M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$99.5M
$764.3M
Q2 25
$107.0M
$571.2M
Q1 25
$119.1M
$593.0M
Q4 24
$118.5M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$38.5M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$57.3M
$861.3M
Operating Margin
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
11.3%
Q4 25
11.6%
72.2%
Q3 25
8.7%
42.5%
Q2 25
9.8%
41.8%
Q1 25
11.0%
41.1%
Q4 24
11.5%
64.6%
Q3 24
5.0%
61.4%
Q2 24
6.1%
51.0%
Net Margin
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
8.7%
Q4 25
8.8%
62.1%
Q3 25
7.4%
34.5%
Q2 25
7.3%
26.2%
Q1 25
8.4%
27.7%
Q4 24
8.7%
58.1%
Q3 24
3.4%
49.4%
Q2 24
4.7%
42.9%
EPS (diluted)
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$2.86
$1.50
Q3 25
$2.17
$0.82
Q2 25
$2.31
$0.61
Q1 25
$2.56
$0.63
Q4 24
$2.61
$1.38
Q3 24
$0.84
$1.08
Q2 24
$1.22
$0.92

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
$35.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$406.0M
$53.2B
Total Assets
$2.8B
$98.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×
0.66×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
Q4 25
$15.0M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$33.6M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$18.9M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$17.5M
$671.1M
Q4 24
$14.8M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$16.2M
$780.9M
Q2 24
$64.6M
$598.3M
Total Debt
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
$35.0B
Q3 25
$525.8M
$35.3B
Q2 25
$426.0M
$34.7B
Q1 25
$518.3M
$32.3B
Q4 24
$652.0M
$30.9B
Q3 24
$806.9M
$32.3B
Q2 24
$786.3M
$29.9B
Stockholders' Equity
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$379.3M
$53.2B
Q3 25
$343.9M
$52.6B
Q2 25
$370.9M
$52.7B
Q1 25
$259.0M
$53.5B
Q4 24
$131.5M
$54.0B
Q3 24
$12.7M
$53.1B
Q2 24
$39.4M
$53.3B
Total Assets
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$98.7B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$98.3B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$97.7B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$96.0B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$95.3B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$95.9B
Q2 24
$2.6B
$93.5B
Debt / Equity
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
0.66×
Q3 25
1.53×
0.67×
Q2 25
1.15×
0.66×
Q1 25
2.00×
0.60×
Q4 24
4.96×
0.57×
Q3 24
63.54×
0.61×
Q2 24
19.96×
0.56×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$571.8M
$1.2B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.47×
0.83×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$218.9M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$120.8M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$186.0M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$212.0M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$218.2M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$62.8M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$141.5M
$1.1B
Free Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
Q3 25
$62.2M
Q2 25
$106.1M
Q1 25
$132.4M
Q4 24
$168.9M
Q3 24
$6.3M
Q2 24
$83.5M
FCF Margin
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
Q4 25
10.7%
Q3 25
4.6%
Q2 25
7.3%
Q1 25
9.3%
Q4 24
12.4%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
6.9%
Capex Intensity
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
Q4 25
4.4%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
5.5%
Q1 25
5.6%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
5.0%
Q2 24
4.8%
Cash Conversion
EAT
EAT
PLD
PLD
Q3 26
4.47×
Q4 25
1.70×
0.83×
Q3 25
1.21×
1.89×
Q2 25
1.74×
2.17×
Q1 25
1.78×
1.96×
Q4 24
1.84×
1.04×
Q3 24
1.63×
1.43×
Q2 24
2.47×
1.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

PLD
PLD

Real Estate Operations Segment$2.0B88%
Unconsolidated Co Investment Ventures$131.7M6%
Other$82.6M4%
Strategic Capital Segment$49.9M2%

Related Comparisons