vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× Virtu Financial, Inc.). Virtu Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs 8.7%, a 22.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Virtu Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.7% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Virtu Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs 10.3%).

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.

EAT vs VIRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EAT
EAT
1.3× larger
EAT
$1.5B
$1.1B
VIRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VIRT
VIRT
+27.6% gap
VIRT
30.7%
3.2%
EAT
Higher net margin
VIRT
VIRT
22.9% more per $
VIRT
31.6%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VIRT
VIRT
Annualised
VIRT
25.7%
10.3%
EAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Revenue
$1.5B
$1.1B
Net Profit
$127.9M
$346.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
11.3%
37.4%
Net Margin
8.7%
31.6%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
30.7%
Net Profit YoY
82.8%
EPS (diluted)
$2.87
$1.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$1.5B
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$969.9M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$824.8M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$999.6M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$837.9M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$834.3M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$706.8M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$693.0M
Net Profit
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$127.9M
$346.6M
Q4 25
$128.5M
$139.9M
Q3 25
$99.5M
$77.6M
Q2 25
$107.0M
$151.2M
Q1 25
$119.1M
$99.7M
Q4 24
$118.5M
$94.1M
Q3 24
$38.5M
$60.0M
Q2 24
$57.3M
$66.6M
Operating Margin
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
11.3%
37.4%
Q4 25
11.6%
35.4%
Q3 25
8.7%
21.8%
Q2 25
9.8%
34.7%
Q1 25
11.0%
26.7%
Q4 24
11.5%
24.3%
Q3 24
5.0%
20.8%
Q2 24
6.1%
22.4%
Net Margin
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
8.7%
31.6%
Q4 25
8.8%
14.4%
Q3 25
7.4%
9.4%
Q2 25
7.3%
15.1%
Q1 25
8.4%
11.9%
Q4 24
8.7%
11.3%
Q3 24
3.4%
8.5%
Q2 24
4.7%
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$2.87
$1.99
Q4 25
$2.86
$1.54
Q3 25
$2.17
$0.86
Q2 25
$2.31
$1.65
Q1 25
$2.56
$1.08
Q4 24
$2.61
$1.03
Q3 24
$0.84
$0.64
Q2 24
$1.22
$0.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$973.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$406.0M
$2.2B
Total Assets
$2.8B
$25.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$973.2M
Q4 25
$15.0M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$33.6M
$707.9M
Q2 25
$18.9M
$752.1M
Q1 25
$17.5M
$723.6M
Q4 24
$14.8M
$872.5M
Q3 24
$16.2M
$701.4M
Q2 24
$64.6M
$684.8M
Total Debt
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
$2.0B
Q3 25
$525.8M
$2.0B
Q2 25
$426.0M
$1.7B
Q1 25
$518.3M
$1.7B
Q4 24
$652.0M
$1.7B
Q3 24
$806.9M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$786.3M
$1.7B
Stockholders' Equity
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$406.0M
$2.2B
Q4 25
$379.3M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$343.9M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$370.9M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$259.0M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$131.5M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$12.7M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$39.4M
$1.2B
Total Assets
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$2.8B
$25.1B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$20.2B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$21.3B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$19.3B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$17.5B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$15.4B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$14.4B
Q2 24
$2.6B
$13.9B
Debt / Equity
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
1.29×
Q3 25
1.53×
1.40×
Q2 25
1.15×
1.24×
Q1 25
2.00×
1.33×
Q4 24
4.96×
1.39×
Q3 24
63.54×
1.41×
Q2 24
19.96×
1.41×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$218.9M
$518.4M
Q3 25
$120.8M
$-68.7M
Q2 25
$186.0M
$62.8M
Q1 25
$212.0M
$15.0M
Q4 24
$218.2M
$599.0M
Q3 24
$62.8M
$112.1M
Q2 24
$141.5M
$490.8M
Free Cash Flow
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
$495.6M
Q3 25
$62.2M
$-76.7M
Q2 25
$106.1M
$57.6M
Q1 25
$132.4M
$9.2M
Q4 24
$168.9M
$586.6M
Q3 24
$6.3M
$106.2M
Q2 24
$83.5M
$486.9M
FCF Margin
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.7%
51.1%
Q3 25
4.6%
-9.3%
Q2 25
7.3%
5.8%
Q1 25
9.3%
1.1%
Q4 24
12.4%
70.3%
Q3 24
0.6%
15.0%
Q2 24
6.9%
70.3%
Capex Intensity
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.4%
2.4%
Q3 25
4.3%
1.0%
Q2 25
5.5%
0.5%
Q1 25
5.6%
0.7%
Q4 24
3.6%
1.5%
Q3 24
5.0%
0.8%
Q2 24
4.8%
0.6%
Cash Conversion
EAT
EAT
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
1.70×
3.71×
Q3 25
1.21×
-0.89×
Q2 25
1.74×
0.42×
Q1 25
1.78×
0.15×
Q4 24
1.84×
6.37×
Q3 24
1.63×
1.87×
Q2 24
2.47×
7.37×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

VIRT
VIRT

Trading income, net$789.1M72%
Commissions, net and technology services$186.6M17%
Other$119.6M11%

Related Comparisons