vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK) and SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.5× ECB Bancorp, Inc.). ECB Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.3% vs -17.0%, a 44.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS Innovations International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs 33.8%). ECB Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.0M vs $-3.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SS Innovations International, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.9% CAGR vs 23.8%).
ECB Bancorp, Inc. (MD) is a US-based bank holding company. It offers a full suite of retail and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, consumer loans, commercial financing and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individuals and small-to-mid enterprises across local markets in Maryland.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
ECBK vs SSII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $14.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 36.7% | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | 27.3% | -17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.8% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.5% | -28.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $-256.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $791.0K | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.0K | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | 36.7% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | -115.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | -22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | -111.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | -23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | -91.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -270.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.18 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.09 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.8M | $3.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $171.9M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $74.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $82.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.7M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.4M | $466.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.8M | $220.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.7M | $608.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.8M | $948.1K |
| Q4 25 | $171.9M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.3M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.5M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.8M | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $74.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $35.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.0M | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 94.7% | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.2M | $-22.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-631.0K | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $861.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-429.0K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-649.0K | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-449.0K | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | 94.7% | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.9% | -64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.0% | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.4% | -136.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 86.8% | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | -69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.2% | -76.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.69× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECBK
Segment breakdown not available.
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |
