vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Everus Construction Group, Inc. (ECG) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Everus Construction Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $751.2M, roughly 1.3× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 5.5%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Everus Construction Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.2% vs 20.8%). Monolithic Power Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($63.9M vs $23.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 27.1%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
ECG vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $751.2M |
| Net Profit | $55.3M | $171.7M |
| Gross Margin | 11.6% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.5% | 22.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.2% | 20.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | -86.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $3.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $986.8M | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.5M | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $826.6M | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.6M | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $761.0M | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $703.4M | $507.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $625.7M | $457.9M |
| Q4 25 | $55.3M | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.0M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.8M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0M | $100.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.2M | $92.5M |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 55.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.11 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.03 | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $2.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $1.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $281.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $629.8M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.0K | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $288.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $292.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $629.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $573.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.2M | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $453.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $464.3M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $48.2M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.5M | $63.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.3% | 8.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.87× | 0.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $90.0M | $666.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.2M | $239.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $256.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.9M | $231.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.9M | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $216.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $232.1M |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | 2.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECG
| Commercial | $594.5M | 59% |
| Utility | $203.5M | 20% |
| Industrial | $82.8M | 8% |
| Institutional | $66.1M | 7% |
| Service And Other | $28.4M | 3% |
| Transportation | $24.2M | 2% |
| Renewables | $19.8M | 2% |
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.