vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Everus Construction Group, Inc. (ECG) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.2× Everus Construction Group, Inc.). Everus Construction Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs 4.3%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Everus Construction Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.2% vs 18.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Everus Construction Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.1% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
ECG vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $55.3M | $49.8M |
| Gross Margin | 11.6% | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.5% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.2% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | 27.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $986.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $826.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $761.0M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $303.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $281.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $629.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $303.1M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $248.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.0K | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $288.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $292.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $629.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $573.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $453.3M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $48.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $90.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.9M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECG
| Commercial | $594.5M | 59% |
| Utility | $203.5M | 20% |
| Industrial | $82.8M | 8% |
| Institutional | $66.1M | 7% |
| Service And Other | $28.4M | 3% |
| Transportation | $24.2M | 2% |
| Renewables | $19.8M | 2% |
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
