vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Everus Construction Group, Inc. (ECG) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.9× Everus Construction Group, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 5.5%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Everus Construction Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.2% vs 21.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Everus Construction Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.1% CAGR vs 9.9%).
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
ECG vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $55.3M | $343.8M |
| Gross Margin | 11.6% | 76.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.5% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.2% | 21.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $1.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $986.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $826.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $761.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $703.4M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $343.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.3M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.8M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.5M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.11 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.03 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $281.5M | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $629.8M | $682.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 3.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.0K | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $288.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $292.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $682.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $629.8M | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $573.0M | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.4M | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $453.3M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.0M | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $48.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $90.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.2M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.9M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECG
| Commercial | $594.5M | 59% |
| Utility | $203.5M | 20% |
| Industrial | $82.8M | 8% |
| Institutional | $66.1M | 7% |
| Service And Other | $28.4M | 3% |
| Transportation | $24.2M | 2% |
| Renewables | $19.8M | 2% |
TPR
Segment breakdown not available.
