vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ecolab (ECL) and Kinder Morgan (KMI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kinder Morgan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.2× Ecolab). Kinder Morgan runs the higher net margin — 20.7% vs 10.6%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kinder Morgan posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kinder Morgan's revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs 1.0%).

Ecolab Inc., headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, provides products related to water treatment, sanitation, and hygiene, primarily to commercial and industrial customers.

Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.

ECL vs KMI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KMI
KMI
1.2× larger
KMI
$4.8B
$4.1B
ECL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KMI
KMI
+3.8% gap
KMI
13.8%
10.0%
ECL
Higher net margin
KMI
KMI
10.1% more per $
KMI
20.7%
10.6%
ECL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KMI
KMI
Annualised
KMI
22.6%
1.0%
ECL

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Revenue
$4.1B
$4.8B
Net Profit
$432.6M
$1.0B
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
15.3%
29.9%
Net Margin
10.6%
20.7%
Revenue YoY
10.0%
13.8%
Net Profit YoY
1.3%
34.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.52
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$4.1B
Q1 26
$4.8B
Q4 25
$4.2B
$4.0B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$3.7B
Q2 25
$4.0B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$3.9B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$3.6B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$3.3B
Net Profit
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$432.6M
Q1 26
$1.0B
Q4 25
$563.9M
$996.0M
Q3 25
$585.0M
$628.0M
Q2 25
$524.2M
$715.0M
Q1 25
$402.5M
$717.0M
Q4 24
$472.9M
$667.0M
Q3 24
$736.5M
$625.0M
Gross Margin
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
44.0%
Q3 25
44.8%
Q2 25
44.8%
Q1 25
44.2%
Q4 24
43.3%
Q3 24
43.4%
Operating Margin
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
15.3%
Q1 26
29.9%
Q4 25
17.0%
34.0%
Q3 25
18.3%
28.6%
Q2 25
17.6%
31.9%
Q1 25
15.0%
29.6%
Q4 24
14.6%
31.0%
Q3 24
26.1%
30.9%
Net Margin
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
10.6%
Q1 26
20.7%
Q4 25
13.4%
24.8%
Q3 25
14.0%
16.9%
Q2 25
13.0%
19.8%
Q1 25
10.9%
18.6%
Q4 24
11.8%
18.7%
Q3 24
18.4%
19.0%
EPS (diluted)
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$1.52
Q1 26
$0.44
Q4 25
$1.98
$0.45
Q3 25
$2.05
$0.28
Q2 25
$1.84
$0.32
Q1 25
$1.41
$0.32
Q4 24
$1.65
$0.30
Q3 24
$2.58
$0.28

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$519.8K
$72.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.5M
$31.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.0M
$32.6B
Total Assets
$25.0M
$73.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.85×
0.98×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$519.8K
Q1 26
$72.0M
Q4 25
$646.2M
$63.0M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$71.0M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$82.0M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$80.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$88.0M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$108.0M
Total Debt
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$8.5M
Q1 26
$31.9B
Q4 25
$7.4B
Q3 25
$8.1B
Q2 25
$7.5B
Q1 25
$7.0B
Q4 24
$6.9B
Q3 24
$7.0B
Stockholders' Equity
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$10.0M
Q1 26
$32.6B
Q4 25
$9.8B
$31.2B
Q3 25
$9.7B
$30.7B
Q2 25
$9.3B
$30.8B
Q1 25
$8.9B
$30.6B
Q4 24
$8.8B
$30.5B
Q3 24
$8.5B
$30.4B
Total Assets
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
$25.0M
Q1 26
$73.1B
Q4 25
$24.7B
$72.7B
Q3 25
$23.9B
$72.3B
Q2 25
$23.7B
$72.4B
Q1 25
$22.4B
$72.3B
Q4 24
$22.4B
$71.4B
Q3 24
$22.1B
$70.9B
Debt / Equity
ECL
ECL
KMI
KMI
Q2 26
0.85×
Q1 26
0.98×
Q4 25
0.75×
Q3 25
0.83×
Q2 25
0.81×
Q1 25
0.79×
Q4 24
0.79×
Q3 24
0.82×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ECL
ECL

Product and equipment sales$3.2B78%
Service and lease sales$891.5M22%

KMI
KMI

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons