vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ecolab (ECL) and Targa Resources (TRGP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ecolab is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.0× Targa Resources). Targa Resources runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 10.6%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ecolab posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs -7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Ecolab's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs 0.8%).

Ecolab Inc., headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, provides products related to water treatment, sanitation, and hygiene, primarily to commercial and industrial customers.

Targa Resources Corp. is a Fortune 500 company based in Houston, Texas. Targa, a midstream energy infrastructure corporation, is one of the largest infrastructure companies delivering natural gas and natural gas liquids in the United States. Their operations are based largely, though not entirely, on the Gulf Coast, particularly in Texas and Louisiana. Matthew J. Meloy has been Chief Executive Officer since 2020.

ECL vs TRGP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ECL
ECL
1.0× larger
ECL
$4.1B
$4.1B
TRGP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ECL
ECL
+18.0% gap
ECL
10.0%
-7.9%
TRGP
Higher net margin
TRGP
TRGP
2.8% more per $
TRGP
13.4%
10.6%
ECL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ECL
ECL
Annualised
ECL
1.0%
0.8%
TRGP

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Revenue
$4.1B
$4.1B
Net Profit
$432.6M
$545.0M
Gross Margin
43.1%
Operating Margin
15.3%
22.6%
Net Margin
10.6%
13.4%
Revenue YoY
10.0%
-7.9%
Net Profit YoY
1.3%
55.3%
EPS (diluted)
$1.52
$2.51

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$4.1B
Q4 25
$4.2B
$4.1B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$4.2B
Q2 25
$4.0B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$4.6B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$4.4B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$3.9B
Q2 24
$4.0B
$3.0B
Net Profit
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$432.6M
Q4 25
$563.9M
$545.0M
Q3 25
$585.0M
$478.4M
Q2 25
$524.2M
$629.1M
Q1 25
$402.5M
$270.5M
Q4 24
$472.9M
$350.9M
Q3 24
$736.5M
$387.4M
Q2 24
$490.9M
$298.5M
Gross Margin
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
Q4 25
44.0%
43.1%
Q3 25
44.8%
39.6%
Q2 25
44.8%
42.8%
Q1 25
44.2%
28.6%
Q4 24
43.3%
33.7%
Q3 24
43.4%
38.6%
Q2 24
43.8%
27.9%
Operating Margin
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
15.3%
Q4 25
17.0%
22.6%
Q3 25
18.3%
20.2%
Q2 25
17.6%
24.3%
Q1 25
15.0%
11.9%
Q4 24
14.6%
15.9%
Q3 24
26.1%
18.9%
Q2 24
16.5%
20.6%
Net Margin
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
10.6%
Q4 25
13.4%
13.4%
Q3 25
14.0%
11.5%
Q2 25
13.0%
14.8%
Q1 25
10.9%
5.9%
Q4 24
11.8%
8.0%
Q3 24
18.4%
10.1%
Q2 24
12.3%
9.8%
EPS (diluted)
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$1.52
Q4 25
$1.98
$2.51
Q3 25
$2.05
$2.20
Q2 25
$1.84
$2.87
Q1 25
$1.41
$0.91
Q4 24
$1.65
$1.44
Q3 24
$2.58
$1.75
Q2 24
$1.71
$1.33

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$519.8K
$166.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.5M
$16.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.0M
$3.1B
Total Assets
$25.0M
$25.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.85×
5.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$519.8K
Q4 25
$646.2M
$166.1M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$124.1M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$113.1M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$151.4M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$157.3M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$127.2M
Q2 24
$384.0M
$166.4M
Total Debt
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$8.5M
Q4 25
$7.4B
$16.7B
Q3 25
$8.1B
$16.7B
Q2 25
$7.5B
$16.1B
Q1 25
$7.0B
$15.5B
Q4 24
$6.9B
$13.8B
Q3 24
$7.0B
$13.6B
Q2 24
$7.5B
$13.0B
Stockholders' Equity
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$10.0M
Q4 25
$9.8B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$9.7B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$9.3B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$8.9B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$8.8B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$8.5B
$2.6B
Q2 24
$8.3B
$2.5B
Total Assets
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
$25.0M
Q4 25
$24.7B
$25.2B
Q3 25
$23.9B
$24.2B
Q2 25
$23.7B
$23.5B
Q1 25
$22.4B
$22.8B
Q4 24
$22.4B
$22.7B
Q3 24
$22.1B
$21.9B
Q2 24
$21.5B
$21.3B
Debt / Equity
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
0.85×
Q4 25
0.75×
5.43×
Q3 25
0.83×
6.19×
Q2 25
0.81×
6.21×
Q1 25
0.79×
6.34×
Q4 24
0.79×
5.32×
Q3 24
0.82×
5.28×
Q2 24
0.91×
5.25×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.5B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$542.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
23.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$584.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$791.3M
$599.2M
Q2 25
$701.8M
$858.3M
Q1 25
$369.4M
$954.4M
Q4 24
$766.7M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$786.7M
$540.9M
Q2 24
$611.1M
$904.5M
Free Cash Flow
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
Q4 25
$758.0M
$542.3M
Q3 25
$529.7M
$-72.6M
Q2 25
$485.1M
$-47.8M
Q1 25
$131.5M
$162.2M
Q4 24
$407.0M
$601.0M
Q3 24
$550.3M
$-287.9M
Q2 24
$414.2M
$164.2M
FCF Margin
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
Q4 25
18.1%
13.4%
Q3 25
12.7%
-1.7%
Q2 25
12.1%
-1.1%
Q1 25
3.6%
3.6%
Q4 24
10.2%
13.6%
Q3 24
13.8%
-7.5%
Q2 24
10.4%
5.4%
Capex Intensity
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
Q4 25
7.9%
23.8%
Q3 25
6.3%
16.2%
Q2 25
5.4%
21.3%
Q1 25
6.4%
17.4%
Q4 24
9.0%
16.5%
Q3 24
5.9%
21.5%
Q2 24
4.9%
24.3%
Cash Conversion
ECL
ECL
TRGP
TRGP
Q2 26
Q4 25
1.93×
2.76×
Q3 25
1.35×
1.25×
Q2 25
1.34×
1.36×
Q1 25
0.92×
3.53×
Q4 24
1.62×
3.78×
Q3 24
1.07×
1.40×
Q2 24
1.24×
3.03×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ECL
ECL

Product and equipment sales$3.2B78%
Service and lease sales$891.5M22%

TRGP
TRGP

Logistics And Transportation$3.4B83%
Natural Gas Reserves$393.1M10%
Storage Terminaling And Export$130.9M3%
Oil And Condensate$112.0M3%
NGL Transportation Fractionation And Services$64.7M2%

Related Comparisons