vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and FirstCash Holdings, Inc. (FCFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($501.3M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.3× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 16.9%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is an American pawnshop company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas which operates retail pawn stores in the U.S. and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
ECO vs FCFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $501.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $104.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 28.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 20.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 21.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $501.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $411.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $385.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $371.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $413.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $363.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $363.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $366.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $104.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $125.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $130.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $175.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $113.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.75× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $206.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.98× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $206.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $126.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $113.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
FCFS
| US Pawn Segment | $292.2M | 58% |
| Retail POS Payment Solutions | $209.8M | 42% |
