vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $300.3M, roughly 1.3× Five9, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Five9, Inc. is a leading global provider of cloud-native contact center software and solutions. It serves enterprises of all sizes across retail, healthcare, financial services, and technology sectors, offering omnichannel customer engagement tools, AI-powered automation, workforce management, and analytics to boost customer experience and operational efficiency.
ECO vs FIVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $300.3M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 6.6% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $300.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $283.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $279.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $278.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $252.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $247.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $576.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 53.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.6% |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $232.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $785.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $193.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $205.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $370.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $362.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $175.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $240.2M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $775.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $717.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $664.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $622.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $525.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $483.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $83.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $77.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $201.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $83.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $49.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $77.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 84.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
