vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $336.2M, roughly 1.2× FULTON FINANCIAL CORP). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 0.2%).

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.

Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

ECO vs FULT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ECO
ECO
1.2× larger
ECO
$393.2M
$336.2M
FULT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ECO
ECO
Annualised
ECO
20.5%
0.2%
FULT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Revenue
$393.2M
$336.2M
Net Profit
$94.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
41.4%
Net Margin
28.2%
Revenue YoY
4.2%
Net Profit YoY
1.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
$336.2M
Q4 25
$393.2M
$336.0M
Q3 25
$308.0M
$334.6M
Q2 25
$-49.0M
$324.1M
Q1 25
$111.1M
$318.4M
Q4 24
$413.1M
$319.6M
Q3 24
$321.4M
$317.7M
Q2 24
$232.4M
$334.7M
Net Profit
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
$94.8M
Q4 25
$99.0M
Q3 25
$100.5M
Q2 25
$99.2M
Q1 25
$93.0M
Q4 24
$68.6M
Q3 24
$63.2M
Q2 24
$95.0M
Operating Margin
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
Q4 25
41.4%
35.7%
Q3 25
44.2%
38.2%
Q2 25
101.1%
37.8%
Q1 25
49.6%
36.1%
Q4 24
48.7%
27.0%
Q3 24
52.0%
25.1%
Q2 24
56.7%
30.8%
Net Margin
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
28.2%
Q4 25
29.5%
Q3 25
30.0%
Q2 25
30.6%
Q1 25
29.2%
Q4 24
21.5%
Q3 24
19.9%
Q2 24
28.4%
EPS (diluted)
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
$0.55
Q4 25
$0.53
Q3 25
$0.53
Q2 25
$0.53
Q1 25
$0.49
Q4 24
$0.36
Q3 24
$0.33
Q2 24
$0.52

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$116.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$573.1M
$3.5B
Total Assets
$1.2B
$32.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$116.6M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$59.8M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$49.3M
Q3 24
Q2 24
$92.8M
Stockholders' Equity
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$573.1M
$3.5B
Q3 25
$3.4B
Q2 25
$428.3M
$3.3B
Q1 25
$3.3B
Q4 24
$410.4M
$3.2B
Q3 24
$3.2B
Q2 24
$432.6M
$3.1B
Total Assets
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
$32.2B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$32.1B
Q3 25
$32.0B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$32.0B
Q1 25
$32.1B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$32.1B
Q3 24
$32.2B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$31.8B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$111.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$111.3M
$304.5M
Q3 25
$132.2M
$116.1M
Q2 25
$91.7M
Q1 25
$703.0K
Q4 24
$162.8M
$416.6M
Q3 24
$-22.0M
Q2 24
$157.8M
Cash Conversion
ECO
ECO
FULT
FULT
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.08×
Q3 25
1.16×
Q2 25
0.92×
Q1 25
0.01×
Q4 24
6.07×
Q3 24
-0.35×
Q2 24
1.66×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons