vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $29.9M, roughly 13.2× Himalaya Shipping Ltd.).

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.

Himalaya Shipping Ltd. is a global maritime transportation enterprise focused on dry bulk shipping operations. It operates a fleet of modern, fuel-efficient bulk carriers that transport key commodities including iron ore, coal, grain and other bulk raw materials, serving core trade routes across Asia, Europe, and the Americas to support global industrial and agricultural supply chain flows.

ECO vs HSHP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ECO
ECO
13.2× larger
ECO
$393.2M
$29.9M
HSHP

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025

Metric
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Revenue
$393.2M
$29.9M
Net Profit
$1.1M
Gross Margin
76.3%
Operating Margin
41.4%
45.5%
Net Margin
3.7%
Revenue YoY
-4.2%
Net Profit YoY
-84.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
$393.2M
Q3 25
$308.0M
Q2 25
$-49.0M
$29.9M
Q1 25
$111.1M
Q4 24
$413.1M
Q3 24
$321.4M
Q2 24
$232.4M
$31.2M
Q4 23
$271.0M
Net Profit
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$1.1M
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$6.9M
Q4 23
Gross Margin
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
76.3%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
82.1%
Q4 23
Operating Margin
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
41.4%
Q3 25
44.2%
Q2 25
101.1%
45.5%
Q1 25
49.6%
Q4 24
48.7%
Q3 24
52.0%
Q2 24
56.7%
56.1%
Q4 23
40.6%
Net Margin
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
3.7%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
22.1%
Q4 23
EPS (diluted)
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$0.02
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$0.16
Q4 23

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$116.6M
$24.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$701.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$573.1M
$159.3M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$871.9M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.40×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
$116.6M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$59.8M
$24.7M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$49.3M
Q3 24
Q2 24
$92.8M
$21.9M
Q4 23
Total Debt
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$701.3M
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$725.5M
Q4 23
Stockholders' Equity
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
$573.1M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$428.3M
$159.3M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$410.4M
Q3 24
Q2 24
$432.6M
$157.2M
Q4 23
Total Assets
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
Q2 25
$1.1B
$871.9M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
Q2 24
$1.1B
$897.3M
Q4 23
Debt / Equity
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
4.40×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
4.61×
Q4 23

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$111.3M
$8.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
7.55×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
$111.3M
Q3 25
$132.2M
Q2 25
$8.3M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$162.8M
Q3 24
Q2 24
$17.6M
Q4 23
$82.5M
Cash Conversion
ECO
ECO
HSHP
HSHP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
7.55×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
2.55×
Q4 23

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons