vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $310.3M, roughly 1.3× loanDepot, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 18.0%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
LoanDepot, sometimes stylized as loanDepot, is an Irvine, California-based nonbank holding company which sells mortgage and non-mortgage lending products.
ECO vs LDI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $310.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-22.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | -10.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 20.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 32.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $310.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $323.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $282.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $273.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $314.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $265.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $222.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | -32.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | -29.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $337.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $386.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $337.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $459.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $408.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $371.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $421.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $533.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $603.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $386.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $439.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $469.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $506.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $592.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $578.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $637.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $-638.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-648.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-734.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $-638.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-179.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-349.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-278.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-278.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-648.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-186.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-356.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-285.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-283.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -208.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -68.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -113.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -107.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -127.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -255.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
