vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $382.2M, roughly 1.0× LifeStance Health Group, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Lifestance Health (Lifestance) is an American outpatient behavioral health services provider. They provide their services in person and via tele-health. Their services include therapy, psychiatry, TMS, and ketamine therapies. They have landed in lawsuits multiple times over labor violations, leaking of customer information, and misleading investors.
ECO vs LFST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $382.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $11.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 4.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 17.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 264.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $382.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $363.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $345.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $333.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $312.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $312.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $300.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $709.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.1M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.0% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $248.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $282.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $248.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $203.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $188.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $134.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $154.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $284.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $286.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $288.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $287.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $288.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $288.8M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $57.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $46.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $110.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-26.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
