vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and MASIMO CORP (MASI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $371.5M, roughly 1.1× MASIMO CORP). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -17.7%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Masimo Corporation is an American health technology and consumer electronics company headquartered in Irvine, California. The company develops patient monitoring devices, non-invasive sensors, and related software platforms used in hospital and home settings. Masimo has also operated in the consumer audio and wearable device markets.
ECO vs MASI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $371.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-100.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.1% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 22.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $372.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $600.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $496.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $492.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-100.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-170.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-349.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -58.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $312.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $559.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $810.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $312.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $149.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $130.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $177.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $158.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $157.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $559.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $613.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $765.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $772.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $781.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $876.0M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $810.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $946.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.64× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $56.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $191.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $50.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
