vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($424.8M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.1× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (48.9% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is an American sports holding company based in New York City.
ECO vs MSGE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $424.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $92.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 38.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 21.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 22.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $424.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $154.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $145.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $206.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $377.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $134.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | -19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | -17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $157.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $554.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $36.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 15.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $43.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $89.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $554.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $581.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $568.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $577.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $584.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $647.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $599.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.5M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-48.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-94.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $164.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $164.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $212.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
MSGE
| Ticketing And Venue License Fee Revenues | $263.5M | 62% |
| Food Beverage And Merchandise Revenues | $64.3M | 15% |
| Related Party | $43.9M | 10% |
| Arena Licensing Fees And Other Leasing Revenue | $35.2M | 8% |
| Other | $15.9M | 4% |
