vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Metallus Inc. (MTUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $308.3M, roughly 1.3× Metallus Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
ECO vs MTUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $308.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.1% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 315.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $305.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $304.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $240.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $294.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $104.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $683.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $190.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $180.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $240.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $272.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $683.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $686.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $697.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $690.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $686.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $690.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $712.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $736.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-66.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-32.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
