vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. (OWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($755.6M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.9× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (21.3% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Blue Owl Capital Inc. is an American alternative investment asset management company that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: "OWL". Headquartered in New York City, it has additional offices around the world, including London, Dubai, and Hong Kong.
ECO vs OWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $755.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $47.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 22.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 19.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 129.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $755.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $728.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $703.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $683.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $631.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $600.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $549.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $513.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $194.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $194.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $152.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $436.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $155.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $12.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $382.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $359.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 47.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 8.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $382.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $433.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $422.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $324.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $326.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $302.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $422.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $412.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $310.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $314.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $269.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $41.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 68.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.88× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
OWL
| Credit Platform | $455.0M | 60% |
| GP Strategic Capital Platform | $157.0M | 21% |
| Administrative Service | $87.6M | 12% |
| IPI Partners LLC | $33.8M | 4% |
| Other | $22.2M | 3% |
