vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.8× STAG Industrial, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
ECO vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
