vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.2× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
ECO vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $347.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $271.0M | $975.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-106.6M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | 40.6% | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -10.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $283.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $973.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-325.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $82.5M | $71.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-38.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $64.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.98× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
