vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $199.5M, roughly 2.0× VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -5.7%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
ECO vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $199.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $7.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $136.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $93.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
VRTS
| Investment management fees | $169.1M | 85% |
| Administration and shareholder service fees | $17.3M | 9% |
| Distribution and service fees | $11.6M | 6% |
