vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.1× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -21.4%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 6.5%). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($63.0M vs $-86.5M).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
ECX vs ESE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $289.7M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $28.7M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | 22.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $1.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $289.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $286.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $296.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $265.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $247.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $260.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 41.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 39.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $1.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $145.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $186.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $173.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $191.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $68.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | $63.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | 21.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $239.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $73.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECX
Segment breakdown not available.
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |