vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $313.0M, roughly 1.0× FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC). FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs -21.4%, a 56.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs 6.5%).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
ECX vs FIBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $313.0M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $108.8M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 44.5% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | 108.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $250.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $248.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $261.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $251.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $244.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $242.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $146.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $26.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $252.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $383.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $370.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $30.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $305.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $305.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $355.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $82.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.