vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $323.3M, roughly 1.0× ECARX Holdings Inc.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs -21.4%, a 42.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECARX Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -4.3%).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
ECX vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $327.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $342.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $280.7M |
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $101.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $112.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $118.2M |
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 90.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 88.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 92.3% |
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 42.1% |
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $377.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $261.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $163.4M |
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $1.1B |
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.0B |
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7B |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
